Gail Migdal Title, Esq.
  • Home
  • Resume
  • CASE SUMMARIES
  • Testimonials
  • Contact
  • More
    • Home
    • Resume
    • CASE SUMMARIES
    • Testimonials
    • Contact
Gail Migdal Title, Esq.
  • Home
  • Resume
  • CASE SUMMARIES
  • Testimonials
  • Contact

TRADEMARK/TRADE SECRETS/ FALSE ADVERTISING

  • Claims for violations of CUTSA and Federal Trade Secrect Misappropriation Act arisibg out of alleged use of trade sectrets by competing "neighboring rights" royalty collector/administrator


  • Claims of unfair competition, theft of trade secrets, breach of fiduciary duty, and obligations of confidentiality by commercial production house against a former producer.


  • Dispute over protectability of furniture designs.


  • Matter involving two entertainment-related businesses with the same name. The matter involved analysis of Sleekcraft factors, post-sale confusion, effect of USPTO actions, damages, etc. Resolution included various non-monetary terms regarding operation of the two businesses.


  • Trade secrets dispute between executive recruiting firms and their current and former recruiters.


  • Dispute over similarly named competing products being sold by former distributor and use of copyrighted image in promotion of the competing product in advertising.


  • Violating candy manufacturer’s world-famous confectionary egg.


  • Dispute over use of elements of highly acclaimed TV series in beer label and whether same constituted lawful parody or unlawful infringement.


  • Matter involving use of same word as title of award-winning television series and name of record label


  • Matter involving use of software logo in connection with product used to play, edit and create videos


  • Dispute involving moving companies with similar names


  • Case involving misappropriation of data base by provider of supporting software for customer relationship management product


  • Matter involving use by manufacturers of competing high definition televisions with allegedly similar names for their products


  • Legal malpractice matter where underlying suit involved alleged unlawful use of trademarks by online retailers


  • Matter involving trade secrets in connection with asset purchase agreement


  • Controversy involving use of image in series of national television commercials


  • Matter involving similarity in name of hip hop artist and title of rap album


  • Dispute between competing manufacturers of sneakers and whether various of their styles were unlawfully similar


  • Dispute involving allegedly similar names for competing providers of legal recruiting services


  • Multiple matters involving distribution of alleged counterfeits of trademark protected clothing, accessories and beauty products


  • Case involving use of similar phrase and logo by two providers of beauty services


  • Matter involving use of designs created by tattoo and graffiti artist


  • Case involving use of similar product designs by competing online distributors of party supplies and novelties


  • Matter involving use of similar names by two providers of office space for co-working services


  • Dispute arising from use of similar names by competing apparel companies


  • Matter arising from use of trademark-protected artwork in national lingerie chain’s distribution of swimwear


  • Matter arising from use by third parties of trademarked phrase appearing in Youtube video


  • Controversy involving competing distributors of kitchen appliances, including claims of false advertising, trade dress and trade libel


  • Matter arising from use of similar names by two popular restaurants


  • Matter involving federal court and TTAB actions arising from use of similar names by sellers/promoters of organic foods and urban farming


  • Matter arising from use of a mark allegedly similar to that of well-known jeans label


  • Case arising from use of name of well-known 60’s rock band on merchandise


  • Matter arising between two similarly named providers of insurance-related services, including applicability of the Anti-cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act


  • Dispute among former members of indie band regarding use of band name by individual band members


  • Matter arising from use of software and other trade secrets by radio broadcasting stations


  • Matter involving competing companies who organize national trade shows including issues related to trade secret misappropriation, trade libel and slander


  • Case involving trade dress in connection with famous brand of boots


  • Matter involving use of logo of company that places musical works in motion picture trailers


  • Controversy involving rights of current and former members of heavy metal band


  • Multiple matters involving designs in connection with various types of merchandise, including furniture, televisions, watches, sunglasses, and jeans


  • Dispute involving different juice and health food establishments with similar names


  • Controversy involving competitors in lighting design and import business
  • Matter involving charities with similar names


  • Controversy involving musical performers’ similar names


  • Claim involving name of real estate venture


  • Controversy between manufacturer of iconic board game and terminated distributor arising from latter’s use of board game’s design and logos

Copyright © 2022 Gail Migdal Title, Esq. - All Rights Reserved.

DISCLAIMER - PRIVACY POLICY

DEVELOPED BY ADR SERVICES, INC.